![]() This is especially common in depictions of hearings/legal proceedings, where the "hero" talks out of turn, refuses to obey decorum or consider the validity of the other side, makes logically-fallacious arguments that appeal to emotion and in general insists that their point is so important they can screw whatever rules or procedures they regard as a hindrance to getting their point across.Īnd sometimes the author did in fact do their work on their opponent's position and presented the opposite viewpoint in a favorable light. Occasionally, it happens in a reverse manner when the side the author intended to be right loses credibility because their own arguing techniques or methods are worse than they intended. If gone too far, it can result in actively rooting for the bad guys over the good. The straw man can still have stereotypical, oversimplified arguments, they're simply more convincing than the author wanted them to be. over logic and depicts the logicians as "the bad guys").įor those who are wondering "Is a straw man with a good argument still a straw man?", the answer is " Usually." The point in question is presented as bad, the audience is supposed to see it as bad, but the writer failed to consider that it might be a lot more reasonable than it's actually depicted. "strawman" arguments against things like racism), or from the audience and the work falling at very different places on the Sliding Scale of Idealism Versus Cynicism (see example from which the Ebert page quote was drawn, but also almost any instance where a work promotes love, faith, emotion, etc. It has also been known to result from Values Dissonance, in the case of works written in a culture/era different from that of the audience (e.g. This may be caused by Creator Provincialism, Not Doing the Research, or just plain bad writing. And then, sometimes later, sometimes right away, the reader realizes that the strawman has a point that is, the straw-man argument is not as weak as the author intended it to be, sometimes to the point of being better than the "correct" argument. The author attempts to demolish said man of straw. PAGES WILL BE DELETED OTHERWISE IF THEY ARE MISSING BASIC MARKUP.Īn author sets up a Straw Character, or some other kind of straw-man argument. DON'T MAKE PAGES MANUALLY UNLESS A TEMPLATE IS BROKEN, AND REPORT IT THAT IS THE CASE. THIS SHOULD BE WORKING NOW, REPORT ANY ISSUES TO Janna2000, SelfCloak or RRabbit42. The Trope workshop specific templates can then be removed and it will be regarded as a regular trope page after being moved to the Main namespace.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |